Frequently Asked Questions
We offer two types of peer review. Our online Rebutl platform is aimed at getting opposing expert reports critiqued so attorneys can increase their lines of attack and win. The submission process is easy and attorneys can sign up here.
We also offer Custom Peer Review for other use cases. For example, you can use Custom Peer Review to anticipate and address the weaknesses of your own expert reports, support your Daubert/Frye motions with neutral peer reviews, or get and in-depth understanding critical studies the opposition will rely on.
At this time, JuriLytics Rebutl does not offer you to provide any input into who reviews the expert report. Rest assured, the reviewers JuriLytics chooses are top minds in the field.
In Custom Peer Review, depending on the end objective, you may be allowed to provide input into who reviews the reports.
Under virtually all evidence codes, judges are obligated to evaluate the threshold admissibility of proffered expert evidence. Under both Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (and Daubert) and most State codes, this requires judges to either evaluate the reliability and validity of the scientific basis for the evidence or to check whether the scientific opinion or technique offered in court is accepted in the field from which it comes.
JuriLytics Custom Peer Review can be used by courts to answer the questions that judges are obligated to answer.