Showing results 1-1 of 1.
Cases using phrasing similar to:
"The materials simply were used by plaintiff's expert witnesses as a partial basis upon which to assess Gehl's knowledge of closed-throat baler hazards and exercise of due care (or lack thereof) in product design."
District Court Decision: Admitted
Appellate Court Decision: Affirmed
In Daubert, the Supreme Court described a trial judge's "gatekeeping role" in determining whether expert scientific testimony meets the requirements for admissibility under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. ... See 184 F.3d 1259, 1274-75 (10th Cir.1999) (framing the issue as whether the district court erred in allowing plaintiff's expert to testify about and reference various documents relied on by the expert in forming his expert opinion, and concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing this testimony), overruled on other grounds, Weisgram v. Marley Co., 528 U.S. 440, 446 n. 2, 456-57, 120 S.Ct. 1011, 145 L.Ed.2d 958 (2000).Lawn care Gardening tools Lawn mowers