How Credible is an Expert Witness?

expert credibility and jargon

If you’ve been litigating for any amount of significant time, you probably know this feeling: you and your team have prepared your arguments, worked with witnesses and reviewed evidence, and spent enough time internally going over the merits of your case, that you’re near sure you have a bulletproof case. Only to find that it all goes down in flames at summary judgment or in front of a jury. 

Obviously, the earlier you can determine that an expert witness will not be accepted as credible by a judge, the more opportunity you will have to readjust your strategy towards a more credible approach.


Mississippi Judge Uses JuriLytics' Peer Review

accounting ledger

Read about our recent involvement with a Mississippi district court judge who used our peer review process to aid his disposition of a complex accounting fraud case. The case involved 5 experts and cross Daubert motions ​opining on accounting standards, negligence, and business valuation. The district judge used JuriLytics as a technical advisor and requested peer review of the reports to aid him in his disposition of the motions.


Mass Torts Litigation in California: Don’t Forget the Science

pharmaceutical mass tort

Without a way to consolidate cases outside of plaintiff-friendly California, the defense bar will now have one less option in battling these claims. Importantly, and especially with product liability mass torts, the science will become more central to these claims as the parties will engage in a “battle of the experts” subject to the Kelly/Frye admissibility threshold (which some argue has become more Daubert-like after Sargon). Indeed, expert admissibility could become the next “dispositive” blow the defense will use to quash these claims. For plaintiffs and defendants alike, the general causation question will be even more critical to success.


“Phone-A-Friend?” or The Value of Private Peer Review

peer review

Peer Review can have tremendous value for private business by improving the accuracy of key input analysis. The process can also have value as a sharpened predictive tool whereby decision makers who might rely upon inaccurate or un-vetted analysis can avoid bad choices. In these applications, improved decision-making is the goal, not simply publication.


How to Tell if Your Expert Witness Can Testify

witness stand in court house

If you’ve been litigating for any amount of significant time, you probably know this feeling: you and your team have prepared your arguments, worked with witnesses and reviewed evidence, and spent enough time internally going over the merits of your case, that you’re near sure you have a bulletproof case. Only to find that it all goes down in flames at summary judgment or in front of a jury.