JuriLytics' peer reviews and technical advice are unchallengeable. JuriLytics provides judges and juries what they need most, the best independent understanding into illusive scientific or technical expertise. Associating JuriLytics is clearly among the best, biggest judicial decisions I've made. I'm a better judge for knowing them.

JuriLytics strengthened our confidence in the positions our expert was taking. They did a great job of finding us three reviewers for our expert’s report — even over the winter holiday. All this was achieved for under the (modest) budget quoted. We and our clients are very satisfied with JuriLytics. This was our first experience. We will be back.

Although our specific objective did not include use of the peer reviews in court, that option is a valuable feature for those so inclined. JuriLytics has done so in some cases and can provide foundational support for the reviewers’ work product. This could be a mechanism for upgrading challenges to the “reliability” of expert opinions from advocative “swearing contests” by competing “hired guns” experts to a more impartial exposure of unreliable opinions using accepted processes of peer review.